Regulatory crime: History, functions, problems, solutions

Abstract

'Criminal lawyers focus on the traditional sphere of ‘real crime’ - roughly equating to those offences requiring proof of mens rea or fault - while treating regulatory offences of strict liability, often enforced by specialist agencies rather than the public police, as a marginal and, perhaps, embarrassing exception to the general methods and principles of criminal law.’ (Lacey 2004: 144).

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

  • Only published works are available at libraries.

Similar books and articles

Action, the Act Requirement and Criminal Liability.Antony Duff - 2004 - Royal Institute of Philosophy Supplement 55:69-103.
What is a Crime?Grant Lamond - 2007 - Oxford Journal of Legal Studies 27 (4):609-632.
Strict Liability’s Criminogenic Effect.Paul H. Robinson - 2018 - Criminal Law and Philosophy 12 (3):411-426.
The Unfairness of Risk-Based Possession Offences.Andrew Ashworth - 2011 - Criminal Law and Philosophy 5 (3):237-257.
Appraising Strict Liability.Andrew Simester (ed.) - 2005 - Oxford, GB: Oxford University Press.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-07-30

Downloads
25 (#1,715,900)

6 months
2 (#1,995,501)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references