On Content-Independent Reasons: It’s Not in the Name

Law and Philosophy 28 (3):233 - 260 (2009)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Argues that content-independent reasons are intentions. Relies on Grice's distinction between natural and non-natural meaning. Rejects previous accounts, and argues that his account can understand the force of such reasons appropriately, through the conept of enabling-conditions. Illustrates through several paridigmatic types of content-independent reasons.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Sources and Reasons.Fábio Perin Shecaira - 2024 - In Legal Scholarship as a Source of Law. Cham: Springer Nature Switzerland. pp. 25-36.
Do We Have Reasons to Obey the Law?Edmund Tweedy Flanigan - 2020 - Journal of Ethics and Social Philosophy 17 (2):159-197.
In defense of content-independence.Nathan Adams - 2017 - Legal Theory 23 (3):143-167.
Natural Law and Practical Rationality.Mark C. Murphy - 2001 - Cambridge University Press.
Independent of content.P. Markwick - 2003 - Legal Theory 9 (1):43-61.
Sovereign Agency.Matthew Noah Smith - 2019 - In Magdalena Balcerak Jackson & Brendan Balcerak Jackson, Reasoning: New Essays on Theoretical and Practical Thinking. Oxford: Oxford University Press. pp. 248-270.
Introduction.Antonia LoLordo - 2012 - In Locke's moral man. Oxford: Oxford University Press. pp. 1-24.
Natural Law in Jurisprudence and Politics.Mark C. Murphy - 2006 - New York: Cambridge University Press.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
151 (#281,073)

6 months
37 (#225,997)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Stefan Sciaraffa
McMaster University

Citations of this work

Authority and Reason‐Giving.David Enoch - 2012 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 89 (2):296-332.
In defense of content-independence.Nathan Adams - 2017 - Legal Theory 23 (3):143-167.
Resentment and Indignation: Communicative but Not Demands.Coleen Macnamara - forthcoming - In Max Lewis & Antti Kauppinen, Moral Psychology of Resentment. Bloomsbury Publishing.
Authority.Thomas Christiano - 2008 - Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.

View all 16 citations / Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references