Propositions united

Dialectica 64 (2):289-301 (2010)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Gaskin's book The Unity of the Proposition is very rich in material. I will focus only on its central thesis: Gaskin holds that Bradley's regress (more precisely, one particular version of it) is not only innocent, but in fact philosophically significant because it plays a crucial role in solving what Gaskin calls the problem of the unity of the proposition . In what follows, I first explain what that problem is meant to be ( section 1 ), then I present and criticise Gaskin's proposal about how Bradley's regress bears on the problem ( section 2 ), and finally I sketch an alternative approach to the problem ( section 3 ).

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Richard Gaskin: The Unity of the Proposition. [REVIEW]Laurynas Adomaitis - 2012 - Croatian Journal of Philosophy 12 (1):106-111.
B radley's Regress and the Unity of the Proposition.Richard Gaskin - 2008 - In The Unity of the Proposition. Oxford, GB: Oxford University Press. pp. 331-420.
Regress, unity, facts, and propositions.Matti Eklund - 2016 - Synthese 196 (4):1225-1247.
Bradley's Regress: A Matter of Parsimony.Michele Paolini Paoletti - 2018 - In Bertini Daniele & Migliorini Damiano, Relations: Ontology and Philosophy of Religion. Fano, Italy: Mimesis International. pp. 109-122.
Perceptual Content and the Unity of Perception.David de Bruijn - 2022 - Southern Journal of Philosophy 60 (4):540-569.
Cognitive Acts and the Unity of the Proposition.Jeff Speaks - 2020 - Australasian Journal of Philosophy 98 (4):646-660.

Analytics

Added to PP
2010-07-02

Downloads
161 (#258,732)

6 months
12 (#969,130)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Benjamin Schnieder
University of Vienna

References found in this work

Conceptions of truth.Wolfgang Künne - 2003 - New York: Oxford University Press.
Why Truthmakers?Gonzalo Rodriguez-Pereyra - 2005 - In Helen Beebee & Julian Dodd, Truthmakers: The Contemporary Debate. Oxford, GB: Clarendon Press. pp. 17-31.
Platonism and Anti-Platonism in Mathematics.Mark Balaguer - 1998 - Bulletin of Symbolic Logic 8 (4):516-518.

View all 17 references / Add more references