Behavior at the organismal and molecular levels: The case of C. elegans

Philosophy of Science 67 (3):288 (2000)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Caenorhabditis elegans (C. elegans) is a tiny worm that has become the focus of a large number of worldwide research projects examining its genetics, development, neuroscience, and behavior. Recently several groups of investigators have begun to tie together the behavior of the organism and the underlying genes, neural circuits, and molecular processes implemented in those circuits. Behavior is quintessentially organismal--it is the organism as a whole that moves and mates--but the explanations are devised at the molecular and neurocircuit levels, and tested in populations using protocols that span many levels of aggregation. Following a brief review of the main relevant features of C. elegans, I describe some of these circuits, and then discuss two contrasting approaches in behavioral genetics and neural network analysis of the worm. Finally, I outline the rudiments of a "field and focus" explanation model using the two contrasting approaches

Other Versions

No versions found

Similar books and articles

Mapping Development or How Molecular is Molecular Biology?Soraya de Chadarevian - 2000 - History and Philosophy of the Life Sciences 22 (3):381-396.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
180 (#225,903)

6 months
39 (#213,417)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Kenneth Schaffner
University of Pittsburgh

Citations of this work

Reduction, emergence and explanation.Michael Silberstein - 2002 - In Peter Machamer & Michael Silberstein, The Blackwell guide to the philosophy of science. Malden, Mass.: Blackwell. pp. 80--107.
Animal extrapolation in preclinical studies: An analysis of the tragic case of TGN1412.Maël Lemoine - 2017 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part C: Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences 61 (C):35-45.

Add more citations

References found in this work

1953 and all that. A tale of two sciences.Philip Kitcher - 1984 - Philosophical Review 93 (3):335-373.
Interfield theories.Lindley Darden & Nancy Maull - 1977 - Philosophy of Science 44 (1):43-64.
Discovery and Explanation in Biology and Medicine.Kenneth F. Schaffner - 1995 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 46 (4):621-623.
Introduction to Logic.Roland Hall - 1960 - Philosophical Quarterly 10 (40):287-288.

Add more references