True Propositions: A Reply to C.J.F. Williams

Analysis 32 (3):101-106 (1972)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This paper replies to points Williams makes to his reply to Sayward’s criticism of Williams’s proposal of ‘for some p ___ states that p & p’ as an analysis of ‘___ is true’.

Categories

Keywords

Reprint years

DOI

10.1093/analys/32.3.101

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

My notes

Similar books and articles

Williams’ Definition of ‘X is true’.Charles Sayward - 1970 - Analysis 30 (3):95-97.
Being, identity, and truth.Christopher John Fardo Williams - 1992 - New York: Oxford University Press.
Reply to Bernard Williams' ‘philosophy as a humanistic discipline’.Hilary Putnam - 2001 - Philosophy 76 (4):605-614.
Did Williams find the truth in relativism?Carol Rovane - 2009 - In Daniel Callcut, Reading Bernard Williams. New York: Routledge.
Transcendental Priority and Deleuzian Normativity. A Reply to James Williams.Jack Reynolds - 2008 - Deleuze and Guatarri Studies 2 (1):101-108.
Belief-in Revisited: A Reply to Williams.J. J. Macintosh - 1994 - Religious Studies 30 (4):487 - 503.
Prior’s Theory of Truth.Charles Sayward - 1987 - Analysis 47 (2):83-87.
Truth, probability, and certainty: A reply.Gardner Williams - 1942 - Philosophical Review 51 (6):595-600.

Analytics

Added to PP
2011-02-21

Downloads
309 (#142,405)

6 months
39 (#211,804)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Photo of Charles Sayward
Charles Sayward
University of Nebraska, Lincoln

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references