Sibley on ‘Beautiful’ and ‘Ugly’

Philosophical Papers 43 (3):377-404 (2014)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Frank Sibley's ideas have been particularly influential among contemporary philosophers interested in aesthetics. Most studies, however, have focused only on his earlier works. In this essay, I explore Sibley's account of the adjectives ‘beautiful’ and ‘ugly’, paying particular attention to three papers that have only recently been published and that have not yet received adequate attention. In particular, I discuss his account of the adjective ‘beautiful’, which relies on the controversial notion of an aesthetic ideal. In addition, I discuss an account of how aesthetic judgements may change in relation to our coming to know the kind of object being judged and whether, as Sibley maintains, ‘beautiful’ and ‘ugly’ are asymmetric in the sense specified by the author.

Other Versions

No versions found

Similar books and articles

On the beautiful and the ugly.Herman Parret - 2011 - Trans/Form/Ação 34 (s2):21-34.
Aesthetic qualities and aesthetic value.Alan H. Goldman - 1990 - Journal of Philosophy 87 (1):23-37.
Wittgenstein on “Beautiful” and “The Beautiful”.Gabriele Tomasi - 2013 - Aisthesis: Pratiche, Linguaggi E Saperi Dell’Estetico 6 (1):115-137.
Why Sibley is Not a Generalist After All.Anna Bergqvist - 2010 - British Journal of Aesthetics 50 (1):1-14.
The idea of form: rethinking Kant's aesthetics.Rodolphe Gasché - 2003 - Stanford, Calif.: Stanford University Press.

Analytics

Added to PP
2014-11-03

Downloads
257 (#162,082)

6 months
45 (#184,076)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Andrea Sauchelli
Lingnan University

Citations of this work

Environmental aesthetics.Allen Carlson - 2008 - Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references