Complementarity and Scientific Rationality

Foundations of Physics 35 (3):417-447 (2004)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Bohr’s interpretation of quantum mechanics has been criticized as incoherent and opportunistic, and based on doubtful philosophical premises. If so Bohr’s influence, in the pre-war period of 1927–1939, is the harder to explain, and the acceptance of his approach to quantum mechanics over de Broglie’s had no reasonable foundation. But Bohr’s interpretation changed little from the time of its first appearance, and stood independent of any philosophical presuppositions. The principle of complementarity is itself best read as a conjecture of unusually wide scope, on the nature and future course of explanations in the sciences (and not only the physical sciences). If it must be judged a failure today, it is not because of any internal inconsistency

Other Versions

No versions found

Similar books and articles

Epistemic Complementarity and Scientific Rationality.Arunasalam Balasubramaniam - 1983 - Dissertation, The University of Western Ontario (Canada)
Complementarity Beyond Physics: Niels Bohr's Parallels.Arun Bala - 2017 - Cham: Imprint: Palgrave Macmillan.
Niels Bohr: His Heritage and Legacy.Jan Faye - 1991 - Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
Bohr’s Complementarity.Pandora Hadzidaki - 2018 - Proceedings of the XXIII World Congress of Philosophy 60:13-18.
Complementarity and Quantum Cognition.Reinhard Blutner - 2024 - In Prem Saran Satsangi, Anna Margaretha Horatschek & Anand Srivastav, Consciousness Studies in Sciences and Humanities: Eastern and Western Perspectives. Cham: Springer Verlag. pp. 241-258.
No Paradox in Wave–Particle Duality.Andrew Knight - 2020 - Foundations of Physics 50 (11):1723-1727.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
198 (#203,535)

6 months
41 (#207,492)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Simon Saunders
Oxford University