Has psychology debunked conceptual analysis?

Metaphilosophy 37 (1):26–33 (2005)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

The philosophical method of conceptual analysis has been criticised on the grounds that empirical psychological research has cast severe doubt on whether concepts exist in the form traditionally assumed, and that conceptual analysis therefore is doomed. This objection may be termed the Charge from Psychology. After a brief characterisation of conceptual analysis, I discuss the Charge from Psychology and argue that it is misdirected.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
235 (#173,942)

6 months
22 (#466,507)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Per Sandin
Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences

References found in this work

Logical foundations of probability.Rudolf Carnap - 1950 - Chicago]: Chicago University of Chicago Press.
A treatise concerning the principles of human knowledge.George Berkeley - 1710 - Mineola, N.Y.: Dover Publications. Edited by Thomas J. McCormack.

View all 16 references / Add more references