Feminist matters, critique and the future of the political

Feminist Theory 21 (4):501-516 (2020)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Over the last decades, many scholars, feminist and others, have argued that critique must be reframed in different and more ‘productive’ ways because its ‘conventional’ formulation and practice have outlived its usefulness as a conceptual tool. Instead, they have called for affirmation or affirmative critique and a more generative mode of critical engagement in the search for new imaginaries, transformative potentialities and other futures. New feminist materialist thought’s emergence is, we argue, symptomatic of this contemporary intellectual landscape that claims to move beyond critique. While sympathetic with the desire to rethink a form of critique that speaks to the (urgent) politics of the present and the remaking of political imaginaries, we argue that the theoretical gesture to move beyond critique may offer a potentially troubling remapping organised around certain kinds of repression (of the undetermined and ambivalent work of critique) and amnesia (of feminist genealogies and over different feminist projects’ conceptualisation of matter) that yield a politics without politics.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Analytics

Added to PP
2020-12-09

Downloads
83 (#676,440)

6 months
21 (#498,551)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

The Politics of Feminist New Materialisms: Insights from Experimenting with Academic Practices.Rosi Braidotti, Felicity Colman & Iris van der Tuin - 2024 - In Rosi Braidotti, Felicity Colman & Iris van der Tuin, Methods and Genealogies of New Materialisms. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press. pp. 384-406.

Add more citations

References found in this work

S.Marcus Willaschek, Jürgen Stolzenberg, Georg Mohr & Stefano Bacin - 2015 - In Marcus Willaschek, Jürgen Stolzenberg, Georg Mohr & Stefano Bacin, Kant-Lexikon. Berlin: De Gruyter. pp. 1995-2243.

View all 25 references / Add more references