Feyerabend and the Description Theory of Reference

Journal of Philosophical Research 16:223-232 (1991)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

In his early work Feyerabend argues that certain theories are incommensurable due to semantic variance. In this paper it is argued that Feyerabend relies on a description theory of reference in the course of his argument for incommensurability and in his analysis of the relevant kind of semantic variance. Against this it is objected that such reliance on the description theory eliminates ostensive reference determination and obscures the presence of theoretical conflict.

Other Versions

No versions found

Similar books and articles

Incommensurability: The Current State of Play.Howard Sankey - 1997 - Theoria: Revista de Teoría, Historia y Fundamentos de la Ciencia 12 (3):425-445.
Farewell to Feyerabend.Harvey Siegel - 1989 - Inquiry: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy 32 (3):343 – 369.
II. More on democratic relativism: A response to Alford.Steven Yates - 1985 - Inquiry: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy 28 (1-4):450-453.
III. Yates on Feyerabend's democratic relativism.C. Fred Alford - 1985 - Inquiry: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy 28 (1-4):113-118.

Analytics

Added to PP
2011-12-02

Downloads
598 (#94,729)

6 months
182 (#61,883)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Howard Sankey
University of Melbourne

Citations of this work

The Incommensurability Thesis.Howard Sankey - 1994 - Abingdon: Taylor and Francis.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Problems of empiricism.Paul Feyerabend - 1965 - New York: Cambridge University Press.
Realism, rationalism, and scientific method.Paul Feyerabend - 1981 - New York: Cambridge University Press.

Add more references