The Logic of What Might Have Been

Philosophical Review 98 (1):3-34 (1989)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

The dogma that the propositional logic of metaphysical modality is S5 is rebutted. The author exposes fallacies in standard arguments supporting S5, arguing that propositional metaphysical modal logic is weaker even than both S4 and B, and is instead the minimal and weak metaphysical-modal logic T.

Other Versions

No versions found

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
1,936 (#16,487)

6 months
536 (#6,702)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Nathan Salmón
University of California, Santa Barbara

Citations of this work

Modal science.Timothy Williamson - 2016 - Canadian Journal of Philosophy 46 (4-5):453-492.
The Broadest Necessity.Andrew Bacon - 2018 - Journal of Philosophical Logic 47 (5):733-783.
Essence and Necessity.Andreas Ditter - 2022 - Journal of Philosophical Logic 51 (3):653-690.
What is Normative Necessity?Gideon Rosen - 2020 - In Mircea Dumitru, Metaphysics, Meaning, and Modality: Themes from Kit Fine. Oxford, GB: Oxford University Press. pp. 205-233.
Does Ontology Rest on a Mistake?Stephen Yablo - 1998 - Aristotelian Society Supplementary Volume 72 (1):229 - 283.

View all 164 citations / Add more citations

References found in this work

Counterfactuals.David Lewis - 1973 - Malden, Mass.: Blackwell.
The Nature of Necessity.Alvin Plantinga - 1974 - Oxford, England: Clarendon Press.
Naming and Necessity.S. Kripke - 1972 - Tijdschrift Voor Filosofie 45 (4):665-666.
On the Plurality of Worlds.David Lewis - 1986 - Revue Philosophique de la France Et de l'Etranger 178 (3):388-390.
Semantical Considerations on Modal Logic.Saul Kripke - 1963 - Acta Philosophica Fennica 16:83-94.

View all 56 references / Add more references