Thesis and antithesis: S-R levers or meaning-perceivers?

Behavioral and Brain Sciences 2 (2):181-181 (1979)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

S-O-R: Wrong model for pointing.William T. Powers - 1992 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 15 (2):349-350.
Church's thesis and representation of grammars.Martin Davis - 1983 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 6 (3):404-404.
The logic of moral outrage.Eric Luis Uhlmann - 2013 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 36 (1):38-38.
L. J. Cohen versus Bayesianism.Ilkka Niiniluoto - 1981 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 4 (3):349-349.
Bindra's S-S contiguity theory of instrumental, learning.M. E. Bitterman - 1978 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 1 (1):52-52.
Really taking metaphysics seriously.Barbara Montero - 2004 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 27 (5):632-633.
The meaning of learning.Anthony L. Riley - 1985 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 8 (3):407-408.

Analytics

Added to PP
2014-01-20

Downloads
65 (#922,050)

6 months
12 (#1,005,307)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Objective knowledge: an evolutionary approach.Karl Raimund Popper - 1972 - New York: Oxford University Press.
Criticism and the growth of knowledge.Imre Lakatos & Alan Musgrave (eds.) - 1970 - Cambridge [Eng.]: Cambridge University Press.
Objective Knowledge.K. R. Popper - 1972 - Journal for General Philosophy of Science / Zeitschrift für Allgemeine Wissenschaftstheorie 4 (2):388-398.
Conditioned Reflexes.Ivan Pavlov - 1927 - Les Etudes Philosophiques 17 (4):560-560.

View all 59 references / Add more references