On Fodor's distinction between strong and weak equivalence in machine simulation

&
Philosophy of Science 40 (March):118-120 (1973)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Categories

Keywords

Reprint years

DOI

10.1086/288501

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

My notes

Similar books and articles

Strong, weak and functional equivalence in machine simulation.A. Rosenberg & N. J. Mackintosh - 1974 - Philosophy of Science 41 (December):412-414.
More on Fodor's distinction between strong and weak simulations.Yorick Wilks - 1974 - Philosophy of Science 41 (4):408-411.
Wired Bodies. New Perspectives on the Machine-Organism Analogy.Luca Tonetti & Cilia Nicole (eds.) - 2017 - Rome, Italy: CNR Edizioni.
Functional equivalence and the defense of materialism.Robert K. Shope - 1973 - Philosophical Forum 4 (4):500-12.
Analog simulation.Russell Trenholme - 1994 - Philosophy of Science 61 (1):115-131.
A new lilliputian argument against machine functionalism.William G. Lycan - 1979 - Philosophical Studies 35 (3):279-87.
Narrow Content: Fodor's Folly.Fred Adams, David Drebushenko, Gary Fuller & Robert Stecker - 1990 - Mind and Language 5 (3):213-219.
Reply to Perner and Howes.Robert M. Gordon - 1992 - Mind and Language 7 (1-2):98-103.
What's wrong with Fodor's and Putnam's functionalism.William Kalke - 1969 - Noûs 3 (1):83-93.
Concepts, the lexicon and acquisition: Fodor's new challenge.Barbara Landau - 2000 - Mind and Language 15 (2-3):319-326.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
125 (#367,094)

6 months
20 (#533,870)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Photo of Alex Rosenberg
Alex Rosenberg
Duke University

Citations of this work

Add more citations

References found in this work

Add more references