Can superselection rules solve the measurement problem?

British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 45 (1):79-93 (1994)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Categories

Keywords

Reprint years

DOI

10.1093/bjps/45.1.79

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

My notes

Similar books and articles

Superselection Rules for Philosophers.John Earman - 2008 - Erkenntnis 69 (3):377-414.
The trouble with superselection accounts of measurement.Mariam Thalos - 1998 - Philosophy of Science 65 (3):518-544.
The Collapse of Decoherence : Can Decoherence Theory Solve The Problems of Measurement?Karl Herlin - unknown
Observation and superselection in quantum mechanics.N. P. Landsman - 1995 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part B: Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics 26 (1):45-73.
Measurement and “beables” in quantum mechanics.Jeffrey Bub - 1991 - Foundations of Physics 21 (1):25-42.
Empty waves in Bohmian quantum mechanics.Peter J. Lewis - 2007 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 58 (4):787 - 803.
How decoherence can solve the measurement problem.Dieter Zeh - manuscript
Superselection rules in quantum theory: Part II. Subensemble selection. [REVIEW]Todd Gilmore & James L. Park - 1979 - Foundations of Physics 9 (9-10):739-749.
What is 'the problem of the empirical basis', and does Johnny wideawake solve it?S. Haack - 1991 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 42 (3):369-389.
Measurement and the justification of the statistical postulate in Bohm's causal interpretation of quantum mechanics.J. Subramanyam - 1997 - Synthese 113 (3):423-445.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
437 (#115,798)

6 months
74 (#137,766)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

Between classical and quantum.Nicolaas P. Landsman - 2007 - Handbook of the Philosophy of Science 2:417--553.
Superselection Rules for Philosophers.John Earman - 2008 - Erkenntnis 69 (3):377-414.
Why Interpret Quantum Physics?Edward MacKinnon - 2016 - Open Journal of Philosophy 6 (1):86-102.
Fictionalism, Semantics, and Ontology.Gordon Michael Purves - 2018 - Perspectives on Science 26 (1):52-75.

Add more citations

References found in this work

The structure and interpretation of quantum mechanics.R. I. G. Hughes - 1989 - Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Quantum Mechanics: An Empiricist View.Paul Teller & Bas C. van Fraassen - 1995 - Philosophical Review 104 (3):457.
The Structure and Interpretation of Quantum Mechanics.R. I. G. Hughes - 1992 - Tijdschrift Voor Filosofie 54 (4):735-736.

View all 7 references / Add more references