Reconstruction in Philosophy of Mathematics

Dewey Studies 2 (2):31-53 (2018)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Throughout his work, John Dewey seeks to emancipate philosophical reflection from the influence of the classical tradition he traces back to Plato and Aristotle. For Dewey, this tradition rests upon a conception of knowledge based on the separation between theory and practice, which is incompatible with the structure of scientific inquiry. Philosophical work can make progress only if it is freed from its traditional heritage, i.e. only if it undergoes reconstruction. In this study I show that implicit appeals to the classical tradition shape prominent debates in philosophy of mathematics, and I initiate a project of reconstruction within this field.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive

External links

  • This entry has no external links. Add one.
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Analytics

Added to PP
2019-04-26

Downloads
818 (#70,919)

6 months
148 (#85,423)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Davide Rizza
University of East Anglia

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

How the Laws of Physics Lie.Nancy Cartwright - 1983 - Oxford, London: Oxford University Press.
Reconstruction in philosophy.John Dewey - 1920 - New York: H. Holt and Company.
What Makes a Scientific Explanation Distinctively Mathematical?Marc Lange - 2013 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 64 (3):485-511.

View all 12 references / Add more references