Spengler defended: A reply to Rekha Jhanji's note on spengler's aesthetic theory

British Journal of Aesthetics 10 (3):284-288 (1970)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Other Versions

No versions found

Similar books and articles

A note on spengler's aesthetic theory.Rekha Jhanji - 1970 - British Journal of Aesthetics 10 (1):71-81.
Spengler's Theory of Civilization.John Farrenkopf - 2000 - Thesis Eleven 62 (1):23-38.
Another look at the "multiple viewpoint" theory: A reply to Richardson.Nan Stalnaker - 1996 - Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 54 (3):287-290.
Reply to David Harrah's discussion note.W. B. Gallie - 1959 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 10 (39):239-240.
The aesthetic and the semantic: A reply to mr. pleydell-Pearce.R. K. Elliott - 1968 - British Journal of Aesthetics 8 (1):35-48.
Aesthetic Experience in Everyday Life: A Reply to Dowling.K. Melchionne - 2011 - British Journal of Aesthetics 51 (4):437-442.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
184 (#220,486)

6 months
31 (#285,230)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references