Fate and destiny: Some historical distinctions between the concepts

Journal of Theoretical and Philosophical Psychology 26 (1-2):205-220 (2006)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

There has been a great deal of attention given to the "free will versus determinism" debate. However, little attention has been paid to the most common expressions from this controversy--people's everyday experience of fate and destiny. In fact, fate and destiny are terms that are often used as synonyms as if there were no differences between the two words. This paper distinguishes the two concepts by reviewing some historical distinctions made by a variety of philosophers, psychologists and scientists. The paper also discusses some of our contemporary understandings of destiny and concludes that an individual's stance toward fate and destiny significantly affects one's sense of life-authorship and vitality. 2012 APA, all rights reserved)

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Analytics

Added to PP
2010-08-24

Downloads
158 (#264,906)

6 months
13 (#895,072)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

It's a Miracle: Separating the Miraculous from the Mundane.Michael R. Ransom & Mark D. Alicke - 2012 - Archive for the Psychology of Religion 34 (2):243-275.
Recommended reading.Michael Allen Fox - 2024 - In Fate and Life: Who’s Really in Charge? Montréal: McGill-Queen's University Press. pp. 159-162.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references