Protected by Substitute Consent as a Human Right: A Reformed Perspective

Studies in Christian Ethics 29 (4):437-460 (2016)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

In 2005, the Universal Declaration on Bioethics and Human Rights (UDBHR) by the United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization (UNESCO) was accepted unanimously by the world community, consisting of 191 member nations, which means that the declaration is currently the first and only bioethical text to which the entire world has committed itself. It must be borne in mind, though, that this document, particularly Article 7 of the UDBHR, is not of religious origin and must therefore be evaluated from a Christian point of view. This article strives to ground the ethical and human-rights issue of substitute consent from a Reformed perspective. The grounding is performed in light of the creation and salvation perspectives.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Analytics

Added to PP
2016-02-04

Downloads
57 (#1,054,348)

6 months
3 (#1,846,442)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

References found in this work

Mercy.Henk ten Have & Maria do Céu Patrão Neves - 2021 - In Henk ten Have & Maria do Céu Patrão Neves, Dictionary of Global Bioethics. Cham: Springer Verlag. pp. 719-719.
Disability.Aart Hendriks & Oliver Lewis - 2014 - In Yann Joly & Bartha Maria Knoppers, Routledge Handbook of Medical Law and Ethics. New York, NY: Routledge.
Disability.Melinda C. Hall - 2023 - In Ezio Di Nucci, Ji-Young Lee & Isaac A. Wagner, The Rowman & Littlefield Handbook of Bioethics. Lanham: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers.

View all 15 references / Add more references