The model theoretic argument, indirect realism, and the causal theory of reference objection

Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 84 (2):146-154 (2003)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Abstract: Hilary Putnam has reformulated his model-theoretic argument as an argument against indirect realism in the philosophy of perception. This new argument is reviewed and defended. Putnam’s new focus on philosophical theories of perception (instead of metaphysical realism) makes better sense of his previous responses to the objection from the causal theory of reference. It is argued that the model-theoretic argument can also be construed as an argument that holders of a causal theory of reference should adopt direct realism in the philosophy of perception.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
180 (#225,283)

6 months
34 (#266,081)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Steven L. Reynolds
Arizona State University

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Realism with a human face.Hilary Putnam - 1990 - Cambridge: Harvard University Press. Edited by James Conant.
Papers in Metaphysics and Epistemology: Volume 2.David K. Lewis - 1999 - Cambridge, UK ;: Cambridge University Press.
Reason, Truth and History. [REVIEW]James Young - unknown - Eidos: The Canadian Graduate Journal of Philosophy 2.

View all 7 references / Add more references