Stakes and Kidneys: Why Markets in Human Body Parts are Morally Imperative

Journal of Moral Philosophy 5 (1):169-170 (2008)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Categories

Keywords

Reprint years

DOI

10.1163/174552408x306771

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

My notes

Similar books and articles

Review essay: Stakes and kidneys: Why markets in human body parts are morally imperative, by James Stacey Taylor.Ph D. Amy E. White - 2005 - HEC Forum 17 (4):319-322.
The moral limits of markets: The case of human kidneys.Debra Satz - 2008 - Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 108 (1pt3):269-288.
A Litmus Test for Exploitation: James Stacey Taylor's Stakes and Kidneys.J. R. Kuntz - 2009 - Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 34 (6):552-572.
In defense of a regulated market in kidneys from living vendors.Benjamin E. Hippen - 2005 - Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 30 (6):593 – 626.
Why Some Things Should Not Be for Sale: The Moral Limits of Markets.Debra Satz - 2010 - New York, US: Oxford University Press.
Paying for kidneys: The case against prohibition.Michael B. Gill & Robert M. Sade - 2002 - Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal 12 (1):17-45.
Are markets morally free zones?Daniel M. Hausman - 1989 - Philosophy and Public Affairs 18 (4):317-333.
Public policy and the sale of human organs.Cynthia B. Cohen - 2002 - Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal 12 (1):47-64.

Analytics

Added to PP
2010-09-14

Downloads
117 (#404,966)

6 months
24 (#413,037)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Citations of this work

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references