Leibniz et « le menteur »

Studia Leibnitiana 51 (1):133 (2019)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Since classical antiquity, theorists have struggled with the problem of self-reference originating in the Liar Paradox of Eubulides: “Does someone who says ‘I am lying’ lie?” Does he speak truly or falsely? The consensus resolution has been to dismiss the contention “This statement is false” as meaningless incoherent on grounds of self-contradiction. Leibniz also deemed the claim incoherent, but not on grounds of self-contradiction incoherence however on grounds of embarking on an infinite and incompletable series of meaningfulness-presuppositions. He thus introduced a novel and constructive mode of semantical analysis.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Marxism as a Disguised Epimenides Liar Paradox and false consciousnes.Richard Michael McDonough - forthcoming - Future Journal of Social Science and Humanities:75-93.
Бесконечный лжец.Vsevolod Ladov - 2014 - Schole 8 (2):285-292.
Taylor Swift's Liar Paradox.Theresa Helke - 2021 - Philosophy Now 145:34-37.
Literary Self-Reference: Five Types of Liar's Paradox.David Lehner - 2020 - Philosophy and Literature 44 (2):476-485.
Analysing the Concept of.Reena Cheruvalath - 2020 - Cultura 17 (1):87-98.

Analytics

Added to PP
2023-01-08

Downloads
34 (#1,507,922)

6 months
3 (#1,846,442)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Nicholas Rescher
University of Pittsburgh

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references