- New
-
Topics
- All Categories
- Metaphysics and Epistemology
- Value Theory
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Logic and Philosophy of Logic
- Philosophy of Biology
- Philosophy of Cognitive Science
- Philosophy of Computing and Information
- Philosophy of Mathematics
- Philosophy of Physical Science
- Philosophy of Social Science
- Philosophy of Probability
- General Philosophy of Science
- Philosophy of Science, Misc
- History of Western Philosophy
- Philosophical Traditions
- Philosophy, Misc
- Other Academic Areas
- Journals
- Submit material
- More
Direct-to-Consumer Genomics, Social Networking, and Confidentiality
American Journal of Bioethics 9 (6-7):45-46 (2009)
Abstract
No abstractAuthor's Profile
Other Versions
No versions found
My notes
Similar books and articles
Review of David B. Resnik, Environmental Health Ethics 1. [REVIEW]Jessica Pierce - 2012 - American Journal of Bioethics 12 (12):68-69.
Social Networking and Personal Genomics: Suggestions for Optimizing the Interaction.Dov Greenbaum & Mark Gerstein - 2009 - American Journal of Bioethics 9 (6-7):15-19.
Direct-to-Consumer Genomics and Research Ethics: Should a More Robust Informed Consent Process Be Included?Katherine Wasson - 2009 - American Journal of Bioethics 9 (6):56-58.
Direct-to-Consumer Genomics Companies Should Provide Guidance to Their Customers on (Not) Sharing Personal Genomic Information.Nanibaa’ A. Garrison & Amy L. Non - 2014 - American Journal of Bioethics 14 (11):55-57.
Direct-To-Consumer Genetics and Health Policy: A Worst-Case Scenario?Timothy Caulfield - 2009 - American Journal of Bioethics 9 (6-7):48-50.
Response to Open Peer Commentaries on “Research 2.0: Social Networking and Direct-to-Consumer Personal Genomics”.Sandra Soo-Jin Lee & LaVera Crawley - 2009 - American Journal of Bioethics 9 (6-7):1-3.
Research 2.0: Social Networking and Direct-To-Consumer (DTC) Genomics.Sandra Soo-Jin Lee & LaVera Crawley - 2009 - American Journal of Bioethics 9 (6-7):35-44.
Protecting Posted Genes: Social Networking and the Limits of GINA.Sandra Soo-Jin Lee & Emily Borgelt - 2014 - American Journal of Bioethics 14 (11):32-44.
Genomics, Ethical Issues, and the Practice of Dentistry.Alexander J. Schloss & Anthony T. Vernillo - 2014 - Ethics in Biology, Engineering and Medicine 5 (4):339-351.
Analytics
Added to PP
2010-09-14
Downloads
96 (#545,253)
6 months
18 (#649,931)
2010-09-14
Downloads
96 (#545,253)
6 months
18 (#649,931)
Historical graph of downloads
Author's Profile
Citations of this work
Direct-to-Consumer Genome-Wide Scans: Astrologicogenomics or Simple Scams?Wayne Hall & Coral Gartner - 2009 - American Journal of Bioethics 9 (6-7):54-56.
Genetic Privacy: Might There Be a Moral Duty to Share One's Genetic Information?Heidi Malm - 2009 - American Journal of Bioethics 9 (6-7):52-54.
Response to Open Peer Commentaries on “Research 2.0: Social Networking and Direct-to-Consumer Personal Genomics”.Sandra Soo-Jin Lee & LaVera Crawley - 2009 - American Journal of Bioethics 9 (6-7):1-3.
Challenges in the Use of Direct-to-Consumer Personal Genome Testing in Children.Holly K. Tabor & Maureen Kelley - 2009 - American Journal of Bioethics 9 (6-7):32-34.
References found in this work
Research 2.0: Social Networking and Direct-To-Consumer (DTC) Genomics.Sandra Soo-Jin Lee & LaVera Crawley - 2009 - American Journal of Bioethics 9 (6-7):35-44.
Try MATCHA Writer if you're interested in citing directly from PhilPapers and certifying your authorship.
This site uses cookies and Google Analytics (see our terms & conditions for details regarding the privacy implications). Use of this site is subject to terms & conditions.
All rights reserved by The PhilPapers Foundation