A proposal for a new system of credit allocation in science

Science and Engineering Ethics 3 (3):237-243 (1997)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This essay discusses some of the problems with current authorship practices and puts forward a proposal for a new system of credit allocation: in published works, scientists should more clearly define the responsibilities and contributions of members of research teams and should distinguish between different roles, such as author, statistican, technician, grant writer, data collector, and so forth.

Categories

Keywords

Reprint years

DOI

10.1007/s11948-997-0023-5

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

My notes

Similar books and articles

Commentary on “a proposal for a new system of credit allocation in science”.Elizabeth Knoll - 1997 - Science and Engineering Ethics 3 (3):251-253.
Commentary on “a proposal for a new system of credit allocation in science”.R. P. Guertin - 1997 - Science and Engineering Ethics 3 (3):249-250.
Commentary on “a proposal for a new system of credit allocation in science”.Richard Martinelli - 1997 - Science and Engineering Ethics 3 (3):255-256.
Commentary on “a proposal for a new system of credit allocation in science”.Drummond Rennie - 1997 - Science and Engineering Ethics 3 (3):257-259.
Commentary on “a proposal for a new system of credit allocation in science”.Paul J. Friedman - 1997 - Science and Engineering Ethics 3 (3):245-248.
Commentary on “a proposal for a new system of credit allocation in science”.Professor R. P. Guertin - 1997 - Science and Engineering Ethics 3 (3):249-250.
Authorship and Responsibility in Health Sciences Research: A Review of Procedures for Fairly Allocating Authorship in Multi-Author Studies.Elise Smith & Bryn Williams-Jones - 2012 - Science and Engineering Ethics 18 (2):199-212.
A new system for credit allocation in science: Comments from a biomedical researcher.David C. Spray - 1997 - Science and Engineering Ethics 3 (3):265-266.
Policies and perspectives on authorship.Mary Rose & Karla Fischer - 1995 - Science and Engineering Ethics 1 (4):361-370.
Rethinking the Value of Author Contribution Statements in Light of How Research Teams Respond to Retractions.Line Edslev Andersen & K. Brad Wray - forthcoming - Episteme: A Journal of Social Epistemology.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
84 (#665,204)

6 months
14 (#832,117)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Citations of this work

View all 22 citations / Add more citations

References found in this work

Truth and trustworthiness in research.C. Whitbeck - 1995 - Science and Engineering Ethics 1 (4):403-416.
Policies and perspectives on authorship.Mary Rose & Karla Fischer - 1995 - Science and Engineering Ethics 1 (4):361-370.
Proliferation of authors on research reports in medicine.Joost P. H. Drenth - 1996 - Science and Engineering Ethics 2 (4):469-480.

Add more references