Analytical Fascism: What Stares Back When One Stares into the De-Enlightenment

Washington D. C.: George Washington University (2024)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

While it is clear what those attracted to fascism today are against, it is less clear what they are for. Not in the sense of how they want to remake society—this is usually clear enough. What is less clear is the fundamental values that are driving their desire to create a different kind of order. Compounding this difficulty, too many liberals are stubbornly sticking to some conventional beliefs: that human nature is as liberals think it is, not something that is fundamentally disputed; that facts are what liberals think they are, even if some people choose to ignore them; and that everybody is pursuing basically the same conception of the good, even if some of them are deluded as to where we are now and how to get where we want to go. But this move to the right is not being driven simply by mistakes; it is a principled move, backed by a coherent, consistent, and historically well-sourced value system, even if this value system is perverse. Fascism has its own conception of the moral subject; of the need for a rigid social hierarchy of men; of the nature of individual rights; and of the importance of purity in blood, soil, and ideology. It believes in the unity of the people, the leader, and the state; it embraces very different and (to liberals) often disturbing moral ends; and it employs starkly different rules of social interaction. And it believes, in the end, that this all leads to the greatest expression of democracy ever invented

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Trumpism, Illiberalism, and Political Morality.Mark R. Reiff - 2025 - Blog of the American Philosophical Association.
Respect for What?Kalle Grill - 2015 - Social Theory and Practice 41 (4):692-715.
The anthropocentric advantage? Environmental ethics and climate change policy.Nicole Hassoun - 2011 - Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy 14 (2):235-257.
The Human Good and the Ambitions of Consequentialism.James Griffin - 1992 - Social Philosophy and Policy 9 (2):118.
Fascism.Christoffer Kølvraa & Jan Ifversen - 2024 - Contributions to the History of Concepts 19 (3):1-21.
Democracy, Philosophy and Philosophers.Bela Egyed - 2026 - Open Journal of Philosophy 16 (2):223-247.

Analytics

Added to PP
2024-12-06

Downloads
1,582 (#24,993)

6 months
526 (#6,092)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Mark R. Reiff
University of California, Davis

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Beyond the Pleasure Principle.Sigmund Freud - 2011 - Peterborough, CA: Broadview Press. Edited by Todd Dufresne.
Fake News.Sharon Rider & Mats Hyvönen - 2023 - In Nathanaël Wallenhorst & Christoph Wulf, Handbook of the Anthropocene. Cham: Springer Verlag. pp. 1499-1505.
Left Behind.J. -M. Eriksen & F. Stjernfelt - 2014 - Telos: Critical Theory of the Contemporary 2014 (169):39-44.
Trump: New Populist or Old Democrat?Stephanie Muravchik & Jon A. Shields - 2019 - Critical Review: A Journal of Politics and Society 31 (3):405-419.

View all 17 references / Add more references