Property rights, genes, and common good

Journal of Religious Ethics 34 (1):41-67 (2006)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This paper applies aspects of Hugo Grotius's theologically informed theory of property to contemporary issues concerning access to the human DNA sequence and patenting practices. It argues that Christians who contribute to public debate in these areas might beneficially employ some of the concepts with which he worked--notably "common right," the "right of necessity," and "use right." In the seventeenth century, wars were fought over trading rights and access to the sea. In the twenty-first century, information and intellectual property are the issues of the day. Grotius's writings serve to correct the overemphasis in modern liberalism on individual rights, and have practical application to the debate concerning the reduction of the human genome to the status of private property

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Analytics

Added to PP
2010-08-24

Downloads
90 (#600,502)

6 months
29 (#326,512)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

Bibliography.Mathias Risse - 2012 - In On global justice. Princeton: Princeton University Press. pp. 415-452.
Bibliography.Gustaaf van Nifterik - 2001 - Grotiana 29 (1):51-72.

Add more citations

References found in this work

S. - 2008 - In A. P. Martinich, A Hobbes Dictionary. Wiley-Blackwell. pp. 269-298.
Contingency, Irony, and Solidarity.Richard Rorty - 1989 - New York: Cambridge University Press.
Contingency, Irony, and Solidarity.Richard Rorty - 1989 - The Personalist Forum 5 (2):149-152.

View all 18 references / Add more references