- New
-
Topics
- All Categories
- Metaphysics and Epistemology
- Value Theory
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Logic and Philosophy of Logic
- Philosophy of Biology
- Philosophy of Cognitive Science
- Philosophy of Computing and Information
- Philosophy of Mathematics
- Philosophy of Physical Science
- Philosophy of Social Science
- Philosophy of Probability
- General Philosophy of Science
- Philosophy of Science, Misc
- History of Western Philosophy
- Philosophical Traditions
- Philosophy, Misc
- Other Academic Areas
- Journals
- Submit material
- More
Other universes : A scientific perspective
In Neil A. Manson, God and design: the teleological argument and modern science. New York: Routledge (2003)
Abstract
This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)Other Versions
No versions found
My notes
Similar books and articles
Too many universes.D. H. Mellor - 2003 - In Neil A. Manson, God and design: the teleological argument and modern science. New York: Routledge.
A scientific perspective1.Martin Rees - 2003 - In Neil A. Manson, God and design: the teleological argument and modern science. New York: Routledge. pp. 80--211.
God by design?Jan Narveson - 2003 - In Neil A. Manson, God and design: the teleological argument and modern science. New York: Routledge. pp. 80--88.
The argument to God from fine-tuning reassessed.Richard Swinburne - 2003 - In Neil A. Manson, God and design: the teleological argument and modern science. New York: Routledge. pp. 80--105.
Modern biologists and the argument from design.Michael Ruse - 2003 - In Neil A. Manson, God and design: the teleological argument and modern science. New York: Routledge.
The meaning of design.John Leslie - 2003 - In Neil A. Manson, God and design: the teleological argument and modern science. New York: Routledge.
Perceiving design.Del Ratzsch - 2003 - In Neil A. Manson, God and design: the teleological argument and modern science. New York: Routledge.
Answering the biochemical argument from design.Kenneth R. Miller - 2003 - In Neil A. Manson, God and design: the teleological argument and modern science. New York: Routledge.
The compatibility of darwinism and design.Peter van Inwagen - 2003 - In Neil A. Manson, God and design: the teleological argument and modern science. New York: Routledge.
Analytics
Added to PP
2009-01-28
Downloads
1 (#2,387,044)
6 months
1 (#2,184,330)
2009-01-28
Downloads
1 (#2,387,044)
6 months
1 (#2,184,330)
Historical graph of downloads
Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.
Citations of this work
The Fine-Tuning Argument Against the Multiverse.Kenneth Boyce & Philip Swenson - 2025 - Philosophical Quarterly.
On Essentialist and Anti-Essentialist Replies to the This-Universe Objection.Kenny Boyce - 2026 - Analysis.
The fine-tuning argument against the multiverse.Philip Swenson & Kenneth Boyce - 2026 - Philosophical Quarterly 76 (1):39-50.
'Simulations all the way up! An atheist’s response to the Fine-tuning Argument.Nikk Effingham - forthcoming - Analytic Philosophy.
Try MATCHA Writer if you're interested in citing directly from PhilPapers and certifying your authorship.
This site uses cookies and Google Analytics (see our terms & conditions for details regarding the privacy implications). Use of this site is subject to terms & conditions.
All rights reserved by The PhilPapers Foundation