The metaphysics of original sin

In Peter van Inwagen & Dean Zimmerman, Persons: Human and Divine. New York : Oxford University Press,: Oxford University Press UK. pp. 319--356 (2007)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This paper argues that there is no straightforward conflict between the traditional Christian doctrine of original sin and the thesis that a person P is morally responsible for the obtaining of a state of affairs S only if S obtains (or obtained) and P could have prevented S from obtaining.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
249 (#166,083)

6 months
33 (#262,025)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Michael Rea
University of Notre Dame

Citations of this work

The Epistemic Axiology of Theism.Elizabeth Jackson - forthcoming - Ergo: An Open Access Journal of Philosophy.
A moderate defense of the fall and original sin.T. Parker Haratine - 2025 - International Journal for Philosophy of Religion 97 (3).
Conceptual engineering for analytic theology.Patrick Greenough, Jean Gové & Ian Church - 2025 - Inquiry: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy 68 (7):2310-2343.
Recent Work on Molinism.Ken Perszyk - 2013 - Philosophy Compass 8 (8):755-770.

View all 27 citations / Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references