Responsibility and the Negligence Standard

Oxford Journal of Legal Studies 30 (1):1-18 (2010)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

The paper has dual aim: to analyse the structure of negligence, and to use it to offer an explanation of responsibility (for actions, omissions, consequences) in terms of the relations which must exist between the action (omission, etc.) and the agents powers of rational agency if the agent is responsible for the action. The discussion involves reflections on the relations between the law and the morality of negligence, the difference between negligence and strict liability, the role of excuses and the grounds of duties to pay damages.

Other Versions

No versions found

Similar books and articles

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-07-23

Downloads
806 (#72,071)

6 months
67 (#142,952)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Joseph Raz
Columbia University

Citations of this work

Artificial intelligence and responsibility gaps: what is the problem?Peter Königs - 2022 - Ethics and Information Technology 24 (3):1-11.
Silence as complicity and action as silence.J. L. A. Donohue - 2024 - Philosophical Studies 181 (12):3499-3519.
Affirmative Consent and Due Diligence.Tom Dougherty - 2018 - Philosophy and Public Affairs 46 (1):90-112.
Negligence: its moral significance.Santiago Amaya - 2022 - In Manuel Vargas & John Doris, The Oxford Handbook of Moral Psychology. Oxford, U.K.: Oxford University Press.

View all 19 citations / Add more citations

References found in this work

Involuntary sins.Robert Merrihew Adams - 1985 - Philosophical Review 94 (1):3-31.
The case against moral luck.David Enoch & Andrei Marmor - 2007 - Law and Philosophy 26 (4):405-436.
Responsibility and Fault.T. Honoré - 1999 - Law and Philosophy 20 (1):103-106.

Add more references