Introduction: Ethnography, Moral Theory, and Comparative Religious Ethics

Journal of Religious Ethics 45 (4):613-622 (2017)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Representing a spectrum of intellectual concerns and methodological commitments in religious ethics, the contributors to this focus issue consider and assess the advantages and disadvantages of the shift in recent comparative religious ethics away from a rootedness in moral theory toward a model that privileges the ethnography of moral worlds. In their own way, all of the contributors think through and emphasize the meaning, importance, and place of normativity in recent comparative religious ethics.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Analytics

Added to PP
2017-11-22

Downloads
94 (#563,815)

6 months
26 (#367,965)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Bharat Ranganathan
University of Notre Dame

References found in this work

Quotation.Herman Cappelen, Ernest Lepore & Matthew McKeever - forthcoming - Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
Philosophy of Religion: Towards a More Humane Approach.John Cottingham - 2014 - New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
Confucius, Rawls, and the sense of justice.Erin M. Cline - 2013 - New York: Fordham University Press.
Recent work on normativity.Stephen Finlay - 2010 - Analysis 70 (2):331-346.

View all 36 references / Add more references