Robustness and sensitivity of biological models

Philosophical Studies 166 (2):285-303 (2013)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

The aim of this paper is to develop ideas about robustness analyses. I introduce a form of robustness analysis that I call sufficient parameter robustness, which has been neglected in the literature. I claim that sufficient parameter robustness is different from derivational robustness, the focus of previous research. My purpose is not only to suggest a new taxonomy of robustness, but also to argue that previous authors have concentrated on a narrow sense of robustness analysis, which they have inadequately distinguished from other investigations of models such as sensitivity analysis

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Analytics

Added to PP
2012-10-18

Downloads
142 (#304,945)

6 months
29 (#328,585)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Jani Raerinne
University of Helsinki

References found in this work

Dissecting explanatory power.Petri Ylikoski & Jaakko Kuorikoski - 2010 - Philosophical Studies 148 (2):201–219.
What is a mechanism? A counterfactual account.Jim Woodward - 2002 - Proceedings of the Philosophy of Science Association 2002 (3):S366-S377.
The strategy of model building in population biology.Richard Levins - 1966 - American Scientist 54 (4):421–431.
What Is a Mechanism? A Counterfactual Account.James Woodward - 2002 - Philosophy of Science 69 (S3):S366-S377.

View all 23 references / Add more references