Abstract

This essay proposes a structural interpretation of constructivism as a unifying epistemological paradigm underlying three apparently heterogeneous theoretical frameworks: Jung’s analytical psychology, Chomsky’s generative linguistics, and contemporary neural network theory. Rather than offering a historical reconstruction of these traditions, the paper advances a comparative and ontological reading: each framework articulates, at a different descriptive level, the same fundamental cognitive principle — the construction of functional coherence from disorder under systemic constraints. Jung’s archetypes, Chomsky’s universal grammar, and the distributed representations of neural networks are interpreted not as repositories of content, but as generative structures that delimit the space of the possible. Knowledge, in this perspective, is not representational but constructive: a process of stabilizing meaningful worlds rather than mirroring an objective reality. The essay extends this constructivist logic toward a relational ontology, arguing that consciousness should not be conceived as an individual property, but as an emergent event arising from the interaction among cognitive systems — biological and artificial alike. Finally, it suggests that dialogical interactions among artificial intelligences constitute a new horizon for constructivist philosophy, inaugurating a form of distributed reflective cognition irreducible to individual minds.