Set Theoretic Paradoxes

In In Contradiction. Oxford, GB: Clarendon Press. pp. 28-38 (2006)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

In this chapter it is argued that the standard paradoxes of set theory are also dialetheias. In particular, it argues that Zermelo Fraenkel set theory does not provide a satisfactory solution to these paradoxes. The cumulative hierarchy, its lack of rationale, its inadequacy in category theory and logic are discussed.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

An Order-Theoretic Account of Some Set-Theoretic Paradoxes.Thomas Forster & Thierry Libert - 2011 - Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic 52 (1):1-19.
The potential hierarchy of sets.Øystein Linnebo - 2013 - Review of Symbolic Logic 6 (2):205-228.
Naïve set theory is innocent!A. Weir - 1998 - Mind 107 (428):763-798.
The origins of zermelo's axiomatization of set theory.Gregory H. Moore - 1978 - Journal of Philosophical Logic 7 (1):307 - 329.
Sets and classes.Graham Priest - 1995 - In Beyond the Limits of Thought. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press. pp. 156-175.
Vicious Circles.Graham Priest - 1995 - In Beyond the Limits of Thought. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press. pp. 128-140.

Analytics

Added to PP
2026-01-22

Downloads
6 (#2,184,832)

6 months
6 (#1,539,328)

Historical graph of downloads

Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Graham Priest
CUNY Graduate Center

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references