A note on the sorites paradox

Australasian Journal of Philosophy 57 (1):74 – 75 (1979)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Informal accounts of the sorites paradox usually emphasize that the problem is one of vagueness. The paper uses the idea of fuzzy truth values to provide a formal semantics which shows precisely how sorites-Type arguments are formally invalid

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Chain-Arguments and the Sorites Paradox.Ran Lanzet - 2019 - Australasian Journal of Philosophy 97 (3):589-604.
Inclosure and Intolerance.Sergi Oms & Elia Zardini - 2021 - Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic 62 (2):201-220.
Sorites and Inclosure.Michael Burton - 2025 - Philosophical Studies 182 (8):2145-2157.
Verities, the sorites, and Theseus’ ship.Igor Douven - 2017 - Synthese 194 (10):3867-3878.
Contextualism and the Sorites Paradox.Inga Bones & Diana Raffman - 2019 - In Sergi Oms & Elia Zardini, The Sorites Paradox. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press. pp. 63-77.
Incoherentism and the Sorites Paradox.Matti Eklund - 2019 - In Sergi Oms & Elia Zardini, The Sorites Paradox. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
197 (#204,969)

6 months
13 (#897,743)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Graham Priest
CUNY Graduate Center

Citations of this work

Māyā and the pluralist predicament.Peter Forrest - 1995 - Australasian Journal of Philosophy 73 (1):31-48.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Deviant logic: some philosophical issues.Susan Haack - 1974 - New York: Cambridge University Press.
Many-valued logic.Nicholas Rescher - 1969 - New York,: McGraw-Hill.
Wang's paradox.Michael Dummett - 1975 - Synthese 30 (3-4):201--32.

Add more references