Social trust, norms and morality

Human Affairs 23 (3):443-457 (2013)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

The article approaches the topic of social trust from an evolutionary perspective. It begins by summarising the most influential approaches that have defined specific and social trust and ascertains what causes differences in degrees of trust and how the potential risk of deception might be lowered. It then notes that the basis of morality had already been formed during the era of prehistoric man, who was able to create coalitions against aggressors and to socially control the behaviour of deviants. It points out, however, that having a certain predisposition to behaving cooperatively or an increased sensitivity to recognising and not tolerating behaviour aimed at abusing cooperation is not a sufficient guarantee of the fact that people will always (or at least in the majority of situations) favour cooperation over deception. One of the reasons for this is a tendency to favour short-term gains over long-term ones. The article argues that establishing norms (moral, social and legal) produces a higher level of social trust because it not only “encourages” individuals to behave in certain ways in particular situations but also works as a sanction which “discourages” the individual from socially deviant behaviour. The article then focuses on a debate about the causal relationship between social trust and social capital. It discusses the suggestion that political institutions, government and the judiciary may reduce rather than raise levels of social capital and consequently also the level of social trust. This is partly because of their powerful position and the consequent scope for corruption and partly because of the fact that even when attempting to act honestly, representatives of these institutions cannot sufficiently reflect upon dynamic change at the local level. Finally, the article ends by adopting the position that social trust is built primarily from bottom up and so it is risky to continually doubt the very existence and usefulness of social norms and morality and to be governed simply by legal norms.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Transparent trust and oppression.Shay Welch - 2013 - Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy 16 (1):45-64.
Trust, Morality and International Business.George G. Brenkert - 1998 - Business Ethics Quarterly 8 (2):293-317.
Creating Trust.Robert C. Solomon - 1998 - Business Ethics Quarterly 8 (2):205-232.
Studying the ethical implications of e-trust in the lab.Cristina Bicchieri & Azi Lev-On - 2011 - Ethics and Information Technology 13 (1):5-15.
Trust: self-interest and the common good.Marek Kohn - 2008 - New York: Oxford University Press.
Trust, social norms, and motherhood.Amy Mullin - 2005 - Journal of Social Philosophy 36 (3):316–330.
The Politics of Intellectual Self-trust.Karen Jones - 2012 - Social Epistemology 26 (2):237-251.
Can we trust robots?Mark Coeckelbergh - 2012 - Ethics and Information Technology 14 (1):53-60.
Norms of Trust.Paul Faulkner - 2008 - In Duncan Pritchard, Alan Millar & Adrian Haddock, Social Epistemology. Oxford, GB: Oxford University Press.

Analytics

Added to PP
2014-01-20

Downloads
69 (#861,510)

6 months
11 (#1,048,571)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

Cover & TOC.Kolektiv Redakce - 2015 - Filosofie Dnes 7 (1).

Add more citations

References found in this work

Breakdown of Will.Ainslie George - 2001 - New York, USA: Cambridge University Press.
The Moral Foundations of Trust.Eric M. Uslaner - 2002 - Cambridge University Press.

View all 11 references / Add more references