- New
-
Topics
- All Categories
- Metaphysics and Epistemology
- Value Theory
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Logic and Philosophy of Logic
- Philosophy of Biology
- Philosophy of Cognitive Science
- Philosophy of Computing and Information
- Philosophy of Mathematics
- Philosophy of Physical Science
- Philosophy of Social Science
- Philosophy of Probability
- General Philosophy of Science
- Philosophy of Science, Misc
- History of Western Philosophy
- Philosophical Traditions
- Philosophy, Misc
- Other Academic Areas
- Journals
- Submit material
- More
What's the predicted outcome? Explanatory and predictive properties of the quantum probability framework
Behavioral and Brain Sciences 36 (3):303-304 (2013)
Abstract
Quantum probability (QP) provides a new perspective for cognitive science. However, one must be clear about the outcome the QP model is predicting. We discuss this concern in reference to modeling the subjective probabilities given by people as opposed to modeling the choice proportions of people. These two models would appear to have different cognitive assumptionsOther Versions
No versions found
My notes
Similar books and articles
Can quantum probability provide a new direction for cognitive modeling?Emmanuel M. Pothos & Jerome R. Busemeyer - 2013 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 36 (3):255-274.
What are the mechanics of quantum cognition?Daniel Joseph Navarro & Ian Fuss - 2013 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 36 (3):299-300.
Comments on Quantum Probability Theory.Steven Sloman - 2014 - Topics in Cognitive Science 6 (1):47-52.
A quantum of truth? Querying the alternative benchmark for human cognition.Ben R. Newell, Don van Ravenzwaaij & Chris Donkin - 2013 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 36 (3):300-302.
Quantum probability, intuition, and human rationality.Mike Oaksford - 2013 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 36 (3):303-303.
Cognitive architectures combine formal and heuristic approaches.Cleotilde Gonzalez & Christian Lebiere - 2013 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 36 (3):285 - 286.
The Potential of Using Quantum Theory to Build Models of Cognition.Zheng Wang, Jerome R. Busemeyer, Harald Atmanspacher & Emmanuel M. Pothos - 2013 - Topics in Cognitive Science 5 (4):672-688.
On Quantum Models of the Human Mind.Hongbin Wang & Yanlong Sun - 2014 - Topics in Cognitive Science 6 (1):98-103.
Realistic neurons can compute the operations needed by quantum probability theory and other vector symbolic architectures.Terrence C. Stewart & Chris Eliasmith - 2013 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 36 (3):307 - 308.
Disentangling the order effect from the context effect: Analogies, homologies, and quantum probability.Elias L. Khalil - 2013 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 36 (3):293 - 294.
Analytics
Added to PP
2013-10-27
Downloads
95 (#554,230)
6 months
28 (#343,808)
2013-10-27
Downloads
95 (#554,230)
6 months
28 (#343,808)
Historical graph of downloads
Citations of this work
Comments on Quantum Probability Theory.Steven Sloman - 2014 - Topics in Cognitive Science 6 (1):47-52.
References found in this work
Extensional versus intuitive reasoning: The conjunction fallacy in probability judgment.Amos Tversky & Daniel Kahneman - 1983 - Psychological Review 90 (4):293-315.
A quantum theoretical explanation for probability judgment errors.Jerome R. Busemeyer, Emmanuel M. Pothos, Riccardo Franco & Jennifer S. Trueblood - 2011 - Psychological Review 118 (2):193-218.
The Structure and Interpretation of Quantum Mechanics.R. I. G. Hughes, James T. Cushing & Ernan Mcmullin - 1991 - Synthese 86 (1):99-122.
Try MATCHA Writer if you're interested in citing directly from PhilPapers and certifying your authorship.
This site uses cookies and Google Analytics (see our terms & conditions for details regarding the privacy implications). Use of this site is subject to terms & conditions.
All rights reserved by The PhilPapers Foundation