- New
-
Topics
- All Categories
- Metaphysics and Epistemology
- Value Theory
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Logic and Philosophy of Logic
- Philosophy of Biology
- Philosophy of Cognitive Science
- Philosophy of Computing and Information
- Philosophy of Mathematics
- Philosophy of Physical Science
- Philosophy of Social Science
- Philosophy of Probability
- General Philosophy of Science
- Philosophy of Science, Misc
- History of Western Philosophy
- Philosophical Traditions
- Philosophy, Misc
- Other Academic Areas
- Journals
- Submit material
- More
The Evolutionary Argument against Naturalism: An Initial Statement of the Argument
In Michael Ruse, Philosophy After Darwin: Classic and Contemporary Readings. Princeton: Princeton University Press. pp. 301 (2009)
Abstract
This chapter contains sections titled: * NotesAuthor's Profile
evolutionary argument against naturalism Naturalism - view that there is no such person as God or anything like God Naturalism performing important function of religion - providing adherents with a worldview proportion of true beliefs among adaptive beliefs semantic epiphenomenalism - received view as to relation between belief and behavior Naturalistic evolution religion/science conflict - between naturalism and science
Links
PhilArchive
External links
(no proxy)
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Through your library
- Sign in / register and customize your OpenURL resolver
- Configure custom resolver
My notes
Similar books and articles
Semantic Inferentialism and the Evolutionary Argument Against Naturalism.James Henry Collin - 2013 - Philosophy Compass 8 (9):846-856.
Plantinga's belief-cum-desire argument refuted.Stephen Law - 2011 - Religious Studies 47 (2):245-256.
Plantinga’s Probability Arguments Against Evolutionary Naturalism.Branden Fitelson & Elliott Sober - 1998 - Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 79 (2):115–129.
What’s wrong with the evolutionary argument against naturalism?Geoff Childers - 2011 - International Journal for Philosophy of Religion 69 (3):193-204.
A House Divided Against Itself Cannot Stand: Plantinga on the Self-Defeat of Evolutionary Naturalism.Timothy O'Connor - 2002 - In James K. Beilby, Naturalism defeated?: essays on Plantinga's evolutionary argument against naturalism. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.
Naturalism and self-defeat: Plantinga's version.N. M. L. Nathan - 1997 - Religious Studies 33 (2):135-142.
Analytics
Added to PP
2014-01-30
Downloads
336 (#135,016)
6 months
17 (#669,456)
2014-01-30
Downloads
336 (#135,016)
6 months
17 (#669,456)
Historical graph of downloads
Author's Profile
Citations of this work
Why methodological naturalism?Hans Halvorson - 2015 - In Kelly James Clark, The Blackwell Companion to Naturalism. Hoboken: Wiley-Blackwell. pp. 136–149.
Darwin's Doubts and the Problems of Animal Pain.Eric Russert Kraemer - 2002 - Between the Species 13 (2):2.
Try MATCHA Writer if you're interested in citing directly from PhilPapers and certifying your authorship.
This site uses cookies and Google Analytics (see our terms & conditions for details regarding the privacy implications). Use of this site is subject to terms & conditions.
All rights reserved by The PhilPapers Foundation