Relevance and disjunctive syllogism

Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic 29 (1):34-44 (1987)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

The validity of disjunctive syllogism is not so easily proved.Chris Mortensen - 1983 - Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic 24 (1):35-40.
A theory of categorical syllogism.Setsuo Saito - 1969 - Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic 10 (3):327-330.
Łukasiewicz, Leibniz, and the arithmetization of the syllogism.David Marshall - 1977 - Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic 18 (2):235-242.
Axiom sets equivalent to syllogism and Peirce.Ivo Thomas - 1976 - Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic 17 (2):248-248.
Relevance and conformity.Harry Deutsch - 1985 - Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic 26 (4):455-462.
A more relevant relevance logic.M. W. Bunder - 1979 - Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic 20 (3):701-704.
Relevance: a fallacy?John P. Burgess - 1981 - Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic 22 (2):97-104.

Analytics

Added to PP
2010-08-24

Downloads
81 (#699,201)

6 months
7 (#1,438,015)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

References found in this work

Relevant Logics and Their Rivals.Richard Routley, Val Plumwood, Robert K. Meyer & Ross T. Brady - 1982 - Ridgeview. Edited by Richard Sylvan & Ross Brady.
Tautological entailments.Alan Ross Anderson & Nuel D. Belnap - 1962 - Philosophical Studies 13 (1-2):9-24.
Relevance: a fallacy?John P. Burgess - 1981 - Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic 22 (2):97-104.
Burgess on relevance: a fallacy indeed.Stephen Read - 1983 - Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic 24 (4):473-481.
Reply to Burgess and to Read.Chris Mortensen - 1986 - Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic 27 (2):195-200.

View all 7 references / Add more references