We Are What We Eat

Environmental Ethics 3 (4):341-350 (1981)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

If it is immoral to raise animals for the purpose of eating during a period of food scarcity because the process of changing grain protein to animal protein is wasteful, then it is surely immoral to waste animal protein which was not raised for the purpose of eating, but which could nevertheless be eaten during periods of food scarcity. Therefore, it is immoral not to eat human carrion during periods of food scarcity.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

We are what we eat.Tom Regan - 2009 - In Steven M. Cahn, Exploring ethics: an introductory anthology. Oxford: Oxford University Press USA.
It ain't fast food : an authentic climbing experience.Ben Levey - 2010 - In Fritz Allhoff & Stephen E. Schmid, Climbing ‐ Philosophy for Everyone. Wiley‐Blackwell. pp. 106–116.
Ethical Veganism, Virtue, and Greatness of the Soul.Carlo Alvaro - 2017 - Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 30 (6):765-781.
Hunting ≠ Predation.Paul Veatch Moriarty & Mark Woods - 1997 - Environmental Ethics 19 (4):391-404.
On Hoffert and the Scarcity of Politics.William Ophuls - 1986 - Environmental Ethics 8 (3):1.
Ecology and the Politics of Scarcity. [REVIEW]Frederick Ferré - 1982 - Environmental Ethics 4 (1):85-87.
The Freegan Challenge to Veganism.Bob Fischer & Josh Milburn - 2021 - Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 34 (3):1-19.
Josh Milburn, Food, Justice, and Animals. [REVIEW]Jan Dutkiewicz - 2026 - Environmental Ethics 48 (1):113-116.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
108 (#456,772)

6 months
14 (#829,537)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references