Niels Bohr’s Complementarity and Quantum Tunneling

In Jan Faye & Henry J. Folse, Niels Bohr and the Philosophy of Physics: Twenty-First Century Perspectives. New York: Bloomsbury (2017)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Niels Bohr’s complementarity principle is a tenuous synthesis of seemingly discrepant theoretical approaches based on a comprehensive analysis of relevant experimental results. Yet the role of complementarity, and the experimentalist-minded approach behind it, were not confined to a provisional best-available synthesis of well-established experimental results alone. They were also pivotal in discovering and explaining the phenomenon of quantum tunneling in its various forms. The core principles of Bohr’s method and the ensuing complementarity account of quantum phenomena remain highly relevant guidelines in the current controversial debate and in experimental work on quantum tunneling times.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Analytics

Added to PP
2018-07-18

Downloads
88 (#621,600)

6 months
24 (#413,037)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Slobodan Perovic
University of Belgrade

Citations of this work

On the status of quantum tunnelling time.Grace E. Field - 2022 - European Journal for Philosophy of Science 12 (4):1-30.

Add more citations

References found in this work

More roots of complementarity: Kantian aspects and influences.David Kaiser - 1992 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 23 (2):213-239.
Why were Matrix Mechanics and Wave Mechanics considered equivalent?Slobodan Perovic - 2008 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part B: Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics 39 (2):444-461.
Emergence of complementarity and the Baconian roots of Niels Bohr's method.Slobodan Perovic - 2013 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part B: Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics 44 (3):162-173.

Add more references