- New
-
Topics
- All Categories
- Metaphysics and Epistemology
- Value Theory
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Logic and Philosophy of Logic
- Philosophy of Biology
- Philosophy of Cognitive Science
- Philosophy of Computing and Information
- Philosophy of Mathematics
- Philosophy of Physical Science
- Philosophy of Social Science
- Philosophy of Probability
- General Philosophy of Science
- Philosophy of Science, Misc
- History of Western Philosophy
- Philosophical Traditions
- Philosophy, Misc
- Other Academic Areas
- Journals
- Submit material
- More
Inferentialism: Why Rules Matter
London and New York: (2014)
Abstract
In this study two strands of inferentialism are brought together: the philosophical doctrine of Brandom, according to which meanings are generally inferential roles, and the logical doctrine prioritizing proof-theory over model theory and approaching meaning in logical, especially proof-theoretical terms.Author's Profile
Other Versions
No versions found
Links
PhilArchive
External links
(no proxy)
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Through your library
- Sign in / register and customize your OpenURL resolver
- Configure custom resolver
My notes
Similar books and articles
Review of Inferentialism: Why Rules Matter, by Jaroslav Peregrin. [REVIEW]Chauncey Maher - 2015 - Notre Dame Philosophical Reviews.
Jaroslav Peregrin: Inferentialism. Why Rules Matter. [REVIEW]Thomas Dabay - 2015 - Logos and Episteme 6 (2):247-250.
Inferentialism: Why Rules Matter, by Jaroslav Peregrin: Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 2014, pp. viii + 278, £60. [REVIEW]Stephen Read - 2016 - Australasian Journal of Philosophy 94 (3):628-628.
Subatomic Inferences: An Inferentialist Semantics for Atomics, Predicates, and Names.Kai Tanter - 2021 - Review of Symbolic Logic:1-28.
From rules to meanings. New essays on inferentialism.Ondřej Beran, Vojtěch Kolman & Ladislav Koreň (eds.) - 2018 - New York, NY, USA: Routledge.
Inferentializing Semantics.Jaroslav Peregrin - 2010 - Journal of Philosophical Logic 39 (3):255 - 274.
The Non-categoricity of Logic (I). The Problem of a Full Formalization (in Romanian).Constantin C. Brîncuș - 2022 - Probleme de Logică (Problems of Logic) 1:137-156.
Why Conclusions Should Remain Single.Florian Steinberger - 2011 - Journal of Philosophical Logic 40 (3):333-355.
Inference, consequence, and meaning: perspectives on inferentialism.Lilii︠a︡ Gurova (ed.) - 2012 - Newcastle upon Tyne: Cambridge Scholars Press.
Analytics
Added to PP
2009-01-28
Downloads
545 (#101,171)
6 months
50 (#171,357)
2009-01-28
Downloads
545 (#101,171)
6 months
50 (#171,357)
Historical graph of downloads
Author's Profile
Citations of this work
The Ethics of Conceptualization: Tailoring Thought and Language to Need.Matthieu Queloz - 2025 - Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Shadows of Syntax: Revitalizing Logical and Mathematical Conventionalism.Jared Warren - 2020 - New York, USA: Oxford University Press.
Logical Consequence.J. C. Beall, Greg Restall & Gil Sagi - 2019 - Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
Re-engineering contested concepts. A reflective-equilibrium approach.Georg Brun - 2022 - Synthese 200 (2):1-29.
References found in this work
The Concept of Law.Hla Hart - 2012 - Oxford, United Kingdom: Oxford University Press UK. Edited by Joseph Raz & Penelope A. Bulloch.
The Emperor's New Mind: Concerning Computers, Minds, and the Laws of Physics.Roger Penrose - 1989 - New York: Oxford University Press.
Try MATCHA Writer if you're interested in citing directly from PhilPapers and certifying your authorship.
This site uses cookies and Google Analytics (see our terms & conditions for details regarding the privacy implications). Use of this site is subject to terms & conditions.
All rights reserved by The PhilPapers Foundation