- New
-
Topics
- All Categories
- Metaphysics and Epistemology
- Value Theory
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Logic and Philosophy of Logic
- Philosophy of Biology
- Philosophy of Cognitive Science
- Philosophy of Computing and Information
- Philosophy of Mathematics
- Philosophy of Physical Science
- Philosophy of Social Science
- Philosophy of Probability
- General Philosophy of Science
- Philosophy of Science, Misc
- History of Western Philosophy
- Philosophical Traditions
- Philosophy, Misc
- Other Academic Areas
- Journals
- Submit material
- More
Factors affecting preference for signal-shock over shock-signal
Journal of Experimental Psychology 72 (2):190 (1966)
Abstract
This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)Other Versions
No versions found
Links
PhilArchive
External links
(no proxy)
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Through your library
- Sign in / register and customize your OpenURL resolver
- Configure custom resolver
My notes
Similar books and articles
Preference behavior in an immediate versus variably delayed shock situation with and without a warning signal.Pietro Badia, Bonnie Mcbane & Steve Suter - 1966 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 72 (6):847.
Preference-for-signaled-shock phenomenon: Effects of shock modifiability and light reinforcement.Gerald B. Biederman & John J. Furedy - 1973 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 100 (2):380.
The effect of reversal shifts and scrambled shock on preference for signaled shock established with unscrambled shock.Brian M. Kruger, Patrick E. Campbell & Mark S. Crabtree - 1981 - Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society 17 (2):113-116.
The properties of stimuli associated with shock reduction.M. D. Nefzger - 1957 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 53 (3):184.
Effects of instructions on the skin resistance response.D. M. Colgan - 1970 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 86 (1):108.
The preference-for-signaled-shock phenomenon: Fifty days with scrambled shock in the shuttlebox.Gerald B. Biederman & John J. Furedy - 1976 - Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society 7 (2):129-132.
Preconditioning the effects of shock-correlated reinforcement.John G. Carlson - 1974 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 103 (3):409.
The effect of signal for error upon learning and retention.R. W. Gilbert & L. W. Crafts - 1935 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 18 (1):121.
Failure to escape shock following repeated exposure to inescapable shock.Robert A. Rosellini & Martin E. P. Seligman - 1976 - Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society 7 (3):251-253.
Analytics
Added to PP
2013-11-22
Downloads
81 (#700,130)
6 months
16 (#715,298)
2013-11-22
Downloads
81 (#700,130)
6 months
16 (#715,298)
Historical graph of downloads
Citations of this work
Observing and conditioned reinforcement.James A. Dinsmoor - 1983 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 6 (4):693-704.
Classical conditioning: The new hegemony.Jaylan Sheila Turkkan - 1989 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 12 (1):121-137.
Modification and avoidance of unmodifiable and unavoidable footshock.Nancy A. Marlin, Alvin M. Berk & Ralph R. Miller - 1978 - Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society 11 (3):203-205.
Explaining classical conditioning: Phenomenological unity conceals mechanistic diversity.Chris Fields - 1989 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 12 (1):141-142.
Try MATCHA Writer if you're interested in citing directly from PhilPapers and certifying your authorship.
This site uses cookies and Google Analytics (see our terms & conditions for details regarding the privacy implications). Use of this site is subject to terms & conditions.
All rights reserved by The PhilPapers Foundation