Constructive Modelings for Theory Change

Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic 36 (1):120-133 (1995)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Alchourrón, Gärdenfors and Makinson have developed and investigated a set of rationality postulates which appear to capture much of what is required of any rational system of theory revision. This set of postulates describes a class of revision functions, however it does not provide a constructive way of defining such a function. There are two principal constructions of revision functions, namely an epistemic entrenchment and a system of spheres. We refer to their approach as the AGM paradigm. We provide a new constructive modeling for a revision function based on a nice preorder on models, and furthermore we give explicit conditions under which a nice preorder on models, an epistemic entrenchment, and a system of spheres yield the same revision function. Moreover, we provide an identity which captures the relationship between revision functions and update operators (as defined by Katsuno and Mendelzon)

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Analytics

Added to PP
2010-08-24

Downloads
141 (#308,095)

6 months
13 (#932,908)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Mary-Anne Williams
University of Technology, Sydney

Citations of this work

Dynamic belief revision operators.Abhaya C. Nayak, Maurice Pagnucco & Pavlos Peppas - 2003 - Artificial Intelligence 146 (2):193-228.
Revision by Comparison.Eduardo Fermé & Hans Rott - 2004 - Artificial Intelligence 157 (1):5-47.
In Search for Optimal Methods: New Insights About Meta-Induction.Gerhard Schurz - 2023 - Journal for General Philosophy of Science / Zeitschrift für Allgemeine Wissenschaftstheorie 54 (3):491-522.

View all 10 citations / Add more citations