Mental attention, not language, may explain evolutionary growth of human intelligence and brain size

Behavioral and Brain Sciences 29 (1):19-20 (2006)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Using neoPiagetian theory of mental attention (or working memory), I task-analyze two complex performances of great apes and one symbolic performance (funeral burials) of early Homo sapiens. Relating results to brain size growth data, I derive estimates of mental attention for great apes, Homo erectus, Neanderthals, and modern Homo sapiens, and use children's cognitive development as reference. This heuristic model seems consistent with research.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Was homo erectus an ecological dominant species?P. Slurink - 1995 - In John R. F. Bower & S. Sartono, Evolution and Ecology of Homo erectus. Pithecanthropus Centennial Foundation. pp. 169-176.
Human evolution.Bernard Wood - 1996 - Bioessays 18 (12):945-954.
Homo sapiens: A good fit to theory, but posing some enigmas.Janet L. Leonard - 1989 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 12 (1):26-27.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
191 (#211,704)

6 months
12 (#971,834)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references