Scholastic Qualities, Primary and Secondary

In Lawrence Nolan, Primary and secondary qualities: the historical and ongoing debate. Oxford, United Kingdom: Oxford University Press. pp. 41-61 (2011)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

The distinction between two kinds of qualities, primary and secondary, is one of the core doctrines of Scholastic natural philosophy. Far from being an invention of the modern era, it is something to which any student of Aristotelian philosophy—which is to say anyone who studied philosophy in a European university up until the eighteenth century—would have been introduced at a tender age. The distinction is, moreover, every bit as important for Scholastic philosophers as it would become in the seventeenth and eighteenth centuries, since the primary qualities, on the Aristotelian tradition, are the fundamental causal agents of the natural world.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Primary and Secondary Qualities.Robert A. Wilson - 2015 - In Matthew Stuart, A Companion to Locke. Chichester, West Sussex, UK: Wiley-Blackwell. pp. 193-211.
Resemblance and Cognition.Michael Jacovides - 2017 - In Locke's Image of the World. [Oxford, United Kingdom]: Oxford University Press. pp. 150-177.
Thomas Aquinas, Perceptual Resemblance, Categories, and the Reality of Secondary Qualities.Paul Symington - 2011 - Proceedings of the American Catholic Philosophical Association 85:237-252.
Descartes on the distinction between primary and secondary qualities.Anna Ortín Nadal - 2019 - British Journal for the History of Philosophy 27 (6):1113-1134.

Analytics

Added to PP
2011-08-24

Downloads
108 (#455,887)

6 months
49 (#174,220)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Robert Pasnau
University of Colorado, Boulder

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references