Parental refusal of medical treatment for a newborn

Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 28 (5):427-441 (2007)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

When there is a conflict between parents and the physician over appropriate care due to an infant whose decision prevails? What standard, if any, should guide such decisions?This article traces the varying standards articulated over the past three decades from the proposal in Duff and Campbell’s 1973 essay that these decisions are best left to the parents to the Baby Doe Regs of the 1980s which required every life that could be salvaged be continued. We conclude with support for the policy articulated in the 2007 guidelines of the American Academy of Pediatrics on non-intervention or withdrawal of intensive care for high-risk newborns

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Withholding hydration and nutrition in newborns.Nicolas Porta & Joel Frader - 2007 - Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 28 (5):443-451.
Treating Baby Doe: The Ethics of Uncertainty.Nancy K. Rhoden - 1986 - Hastings Center Report 16 (4):34-42.
Revisiting the Best Interest Standard: Uses and Misuses.Douglas S. Diekema - 2011 - Journal of Clinical Ethics 22 (2):128-133.
Decision-Making for Adolescents with Gender Dysphoria.Armand H. Matheny Antommaria - 2024 - Perspectives in Biology and Medicine 67 (2):244-260.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
142 (#305,593)

6 months
13 (#895,072)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?