Scrambling, indirect passives, and wanna contraction

Behavioral and Brain Sciences 23 (1):45-46 (2000)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Grodzinsky's general approach to the neuroscience of language is interesting, but the evidence currently available has problems with pragmatic infelicity in experiments involving Japanese scrambling and the interpretation of experimental results on Japanese indirect passives. I will suggest a more direct way of testing the Trace-Deletion Hypothesis (TDH).

Other Versions

No versions found

Similar books and articles

Why the TDH fails to contribute to a neurology of syntax.Alan Beretta - 2000 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 23 (1):23-23.
Cutting a long story (too) short.Stefan Frisch, Douglas Saddy & Angela D. Friederici - 2000 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 23 (1):34-35.
Indirect Passives and Relational Nouns (I).Takashi Iida - 2012 - Keio Gijuku Daigaku Gengo Bunka Kenkyu-Sho Kiyou 43:19-42.
Indirect Passives and Relational Nouns (II).Takashi Iida - 2013 - Keio Gijuku Daigaku Gengo Bunka Kenkyu-Sho Kiyou 44:21-42.
Indirect Passives and Relational Nouns (III).Takashi Iida - 2015 - Keio Gijuku Daigaku Gengo Bunka Kenkyu-Sho Kiyou 46:71-110.
Which grammar has been chosen for neurological feasibility?Zoltán Bánréti - 2000 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 23 (1):21-22.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
143 (#302,743)

6 months
36 (#233,788)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references