On the adequacy of prototype theory as a theory of concepts

Cognition 9 (1):35-58 (1981)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
343 (#133,168)

6 months
24 (#432,968)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

Concepts.Eric Margolis & Stephen Laurence - 2023 - Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
Concepts and Cognitive Science.Stephen Laurence & Eric Margolis - 1999 - In Eric Margolis & Stephen Laurence, Concepts: Core Readings. MIT Press. pp. 3-81.
How To Conceptually Engineer Conceptual Engineering?Manuel Gustavo Isaac - 2020 - Inquiry: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy.
Water is and is not H 2 O.Kevin P. Tobia, George E. Newman & Joshua Knobe - 2019 - Mind and Language 35 (2):183-208.

View all 195 citations / Add more citations

References found in this work

Features of similarity.Amos Tversky - 1977 - Psychological Review 84 (4):327-352.
On the genesis of abstract ideas.M. I. Posner & S. W. Keele - 1968 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 77 (2p1):353-363.
The logic of inexact concepts.J. A. Goguen - 1969 - Synthese 19 (3-4):325-373.
Fuzzy Sets.Lofti A. Zadeh - 1965 - Information and Control 8 (1):338--53.

View all 9 references / Add more references