Mill and sexual reform

Think 17 (50):101-112 (2018)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Should positional sexual misconduct (sexual advances or interaction where one party is known, or should be known, to have a significant power over the other) be included in the list of morally forbidden behaviours? I explore benefits and costs of this moral reform with the help of J. S. Mill.

Categories

Keywords

Reprint years

DOI

10.1017/s147717561800026x

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

My notes

Similar books and articles

Sidgwick and the Morality of Purity.Francesco Orsi - 2012 - Revue d'Etudes Benthamiennes 10 (10).
Conflicting Principles or Completing Counterparts? J. S. Mill on Political Economy and the Equality of Women: Michele Green.Michele Green - 1994 - Utilitas 6 (2):267-285.
Self-Reform as Political Reform in the Writings of John Stuart Mill.Eldon J. Eisenach - 1989 - Utilitas 1 (2):242-258.
Sexual reform congress: proceedings of the third congress of the world-league for sexual reform.S. Herbert - 1931 - The Eugenics Review 23 (2):166.
Bentham and J. S. Mill on Tax Reform: Takuo Dome.Takuo Dome - 1999 - Utilitas 11 (3):320-339.
The method of reform : J.S. Mill's encounter with Bentham and Coleridge.Fred Rosen - 2007 - In Nadia Urbinati & Alex Zakaras, J.S. Mill's Political Thought: A Bicentennial Reassessment. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Auguste Comte and John Stuart Mill on Sexual Equality: Historical, Methodological and Philosophical Issues.Vincent Guillin - 2009 - Brill.

Analytics

Added to PP
2018-09-27

Downloads
707 (#82,287)

6 months
116 (#110,034)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Photo of Francesco Orsi
Francesco Orsi
University of Tartu

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references