- New
-
Topics
- All Categories
- Metaphysics and Epistemology
- Value Theory
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Logic and Philosophy of Logic
- Philosophy of Biology
- Philosophy of Cognitive Science
- Philosophy of Computing and Information
- Philosophy of Mathematics
- Philosophy of Physical Science
- Philosophy of Social Science
- Philosophy of Probability
- General Philosophy of Science
- Philosophy of Science, Misc
- History of Western Philosophy
- Philosophical Traditions
- Philosophy, Misc
- Other Academic Areas
- Journals
- Submit material
- More
Review of Timothy O'Connor, Theism and Ultimate Explanation: The Necessary Shape of Contingency [Book Review]
Notre Dame Philosophical Reviews 2008 (6) (2008)
Abstract
This paper is a review of the cosmological argument that Tim O'Connor defends in "Theism and Ultimate Explanation".Author's Profile
Other Versions
No versions found
Links
PhilArchive
External links
(no proxy)
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Through your library
- Sign in / register and customize your OpenURL resolver
- Configure custom resolver
My notes
Similar books and articles
Theism and Ultimate Explanation – Timothy O'Connor.Samuel Newlands - 2010 - Philosophical Quarterly 60 (239):438-442.
O'Connor's Cosmological Argument.Graham Oppy - 2010 - In Jonathan L. Kvanvig, Oxford Studies in Philosophy of Religion Volume. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
The Shape of Causal Reality: A Naturalistic Adaptation of O’Connor’s Cosmological Argument.Graham Oppy - 2010 - Philosophia Christi 12 (2):281-288.
Theism and Ultimate Explanation: The Necessary Shape of Contingency, by Timothy O'Connor.R. C. Koons - 2009 - Mind 118 (471):862-867.
Timothy O’Connor. Theism and Ultimate Explanation: The Necessary Shape of Contingency. Blackwell, 2008.Sho Yamaguchi - 2012 - European Journal for Philosophy of Religion 4 (4):193--196.
Ultimate Explanation and Necessary Being.Timothy O'Connor - 2014 - In Theism and Ultimate Explanation: The Necessary Shape of Contingency. Wiley-Blackwell. pp. 63–85.
Theism and Ultimate Explanation: The Necessary Shape of Contingency.Timothy O'Connor - 2008 - Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell.
Ultimate naturalistic casual explanations.Graham Oppy - 2011 - In Ty Goldschmidt, Why is the something rather than nothing? Routledge. pp. 46-63.
The Contingency Cosmological Argument.Mark T. Nelson - 2011 - In Michael Bruce & Steven Barbone, Just the Arguments: 100 of the Most Important Arguments in Western Philosophy. Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell. pp. 18–21.
Theism and Ultimate Explanation: The Necessary Shape of Contingency.Peter Forrest - 2009 - Analysis 69 (3):589-591.
Analytics
Added to PP
2009-01-28
Downloads
945 (#59,394)
6 months
233 (#42,602)
2009-01-28
Downloads
945 (#59,394)
6 months
233 (#42,602)
Historical graph of downloads
Author's Profile
Try MATCHA Writer if you're interested in citing directly from PhilPapers and certifying your authorship.
This site uses cookies and Google Analytics (see our terms & conditions for details regarding the privacy implications). Use of this site is subject to terms & conditions.
All rights reserved by The PhilPapers Foundation