Religious Language Games

In Andrew Moore & Michael Scott, Realism and Religion: Philosophical and Theological Perspectives. Ashgate. pp. 103-29 (2007)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This paper is a critique of Witgensteinian approaches to philosophy of religion. In particular, it provides a close critique of the views of D. Z. Phillips.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Analytics

Added to PP
2014-05-08

Downloads
3,684 (#4,666)

6 months
403 (#12,987)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author Profiles

Graham Oppy
Monash University
Nick Trakakis
Australian Catholic University

References found in this work

Wittgenstein on language and rules.Norman Malcolm - 1989 - Philosophy 64 (January):5-28.
Malcolm on language and rules.Gordon P. Baker & P. M. S. Hacker - 1990 - Philosophy 65 (252):167-179.
Wittgensteinianism: Logic, Reality and God.D. Z. Phillips - 2005 - In William J. Wainwright, The Oxford handbook of philosophy of religion. New York: Oxford University Press. pp. 447--71.
Philosophy, theology, and the reality of God.D. Z. Phillips - 1963 - Philosophical Quarterly 13 (53):344-350.
Can theological realism be refuted?Michael Scott & Andrew Moore - 1997 - Religious Studies 33 (4):401-418.

View all 7 references / Add more references